论文标题
随机浅2D量子电路的有效经典模拟
Efficient classical simulation of random shallow 2D quantum circuits
论文作者
论文摘要
随机量子电路通常被视为难以经典的模拟。在某些方案中,这是正式猜想的,没有证据表明,对于具有统一随机门的电路,典型实例的近似模拟几乎与精确模拟一样困难。我们证明,通过表现出具有均匀随机门的浅回路家族,在标准硬度假设下无法进行经典的近似模拟,但可以对除Qubits和Gates的数量线性时线性线性近似较小的电路实例(超过)的电路实例进行模拟。我们进一步猜想,足够浅的随机电路可以有效地更普遍地模拟。为此,我们建议和分析两种仿真算法。在数值上实施我们的一种算法,我们提供了有力的证据表明,在某些情况下,它在渐近上都是有效的。为了分析性提高效率,我们将2D浅随机电路的仿真仿真到模拟1D动态形式的模拟,包括一轮随机的本地单位和较弱的测量 - 通常观察到的一种流程从有效地降低到无效的机制强度,从而经历了从有效的机制到实体的阶段过渡。使用从量子电路到统计机械模型的映射,我们提供了证据表明,我们的算法发生类似的计算相变,就像局部希尔伯特空间维度和电路深度一样,我们的算法与电路结构的参数发生了变化。
Random quantum circuits are commonly viewed as hard to simulate classically. In some regimes this has been formally conjectured, and there had been no evidence against the more general possibility that for circuits with uniformly random gates, approximate simulation of typical instances is almost as hard as exact simulation. We prove that this is not the case by exhibiting a shallow circuit family with uniformly random gates that cannot be efficiently classically simulated near-exactly under standard hardness assumptions, but can be simulated approximately for all but a superpolynomially small fraction of circuit instances in time linear in the number of qubits and gates. We furthermore conjecture that sufficiently shallow random circuits are efficiently simulable more generally. To this end, we propose and analyze two simulation algorithms. Implementing one of our algorithms numerically, we give strong evidence that it is efficient both asymptotically and, in some cases, in practice. To argue analytically for efficiency, we reduce the simulation of 2D shallow random circuits to the simulation of a form of 1D dynamics consisting of alternating rounds of random local unitaries and weak measurements -- a type of process that has generally been observed to undergo a phase transition from an efficient-to-simulate regime to an inefficient-to-simulate regime as measurement strength is varied. Using a mapping from quantum circuits to statistical mechanical models, we give evidence that a similar computational phase transition occurs for our algorithms as parameters of the circuit architecture like the local Hilbert space dimension and circuit depth are varied.