论文标题

ThaddäusDerfflinger在1802-1824期间的黑子观测:理解道尔顿最低限度的主要参考

Thaddäus Derfflinger's sunspot observations during 1802-1824: A primary reference to understand the Dalton Minimum

论文作者

Hayakawa, Hisashi, Besser, Bruno P., Iju, Tomoya, Arlt, Rainer, Uneme, Shoma, Imada, Shinsuke, Bourdin, Philippe-A., Kraml, Amand

论文摘要

当我们正朝着下一个太阳周期(大概具有相对较小的振幅)迈向下一个太阳周期时,重建和描述过去的最小值是根据当时的实际观察到的重大兴趣。道尔顿的最低限度通常被认为是在望远镜观察覆盖范围内捕获的大型最小值之一。然而,黑子组的重建差异很大,并且现有的蝴蝶图在此期间具有较大的数据差距。这部分是因为大多数长期观察结果在历史档案中仍未得到探索。因此,为了提高我们对道尔顿最低限度的理解,我们找到了两个ThaddäusDerfflinger的观察记录(摘要手稿和日志),以及他的Brander的5.5英尺方位角的方位角 - 保存在KremsMünster天文台中。我们已经通过Waldmeier分类修改了现有的Derfflinger的黑子组编号,并消除了所有现有的“一尘不染日”,以消除太阳经络观察的污染物。我们根据他的观察结果重建了蝴蝶图,并在两个太阳半球中说明了黑子分布。我们的文章旨在修改Derfflinger的黑子组编号的趋势,并弥合道尔顿最低限度的现有蝴蝶图的数据差距。我们的结果证实,在循环幅度和黑子分布方面,道尔顿的最低最小值与Maunder最低限度有显着差异。因此,道尔顿的最低最小值更可能是长期太阳能活动中的世俗最小值,而当时需要对观察结果进行进一步研究。

As we are heading towards the next solar cycle, presumably with a relatively small amplitude, it is of significant interest to reconstruct and describe the past grand minima on the basis of actual observations of the time. The Dalton Minimum is often considered one of the grand minima captured in the coverage of telescopic observations. Nevertheless, the reconstructions of the sunspot group number vary significantly, and the existing butterfly diagrams have a large data gap during the period. This is partially because most long-term observations have remained unexplored in historical archives. Therefore, to improve our understanding on the Dalton Minimum, we have located two series of Thaddäus Derfflinger's observational records (a summary manuscript and logbooks) as well as his Brander's 5.5-feet azimuthal-quadrant preserved in the Kremsmünster Observatory. We have revised the existing Derfflinger's sunspot group number with Waldmeier classification and eliminated all the existing 'spotless days' to remove contaminations from solar meridian observations. We have reconstructed the butterfly diagram on the basis of his observations and illustrated sunspot distributions in both solar hemispheres. Our article aims to revise the trend of Derfflinger's sunspot group number and to bridge a data gap of the existing butterfly diagrams around the Dalton Minimum. Our results confirm that the Dalton Minimum is significantly different from the Maunder Minimum, both in terms of cycle amplitudes and sunspot distributions. Therefore, the Dalton Minimum is more likely a secular minimum in the long-term solar activity, while further investigations for the observations at that time are required.

扫码加入交流群

加入微信交流群

微信交流群二维码

扫码加入学术交流群,获取更多资源