论文标题
机构和中国的比较发展
Institutions and China's comparative development
论文作者
论文摘要
省略的可变偏见和反向因果关系的问题妨碍了对制度主义对比较发展的核心评估,因为在地理和人力资本赋值方面并未随机分配制度质量。最近的一系列论文应用了空间回归不连续性设计,以估计机构对国际边界收入的影响,从而推断了边界治理的突然不连续性,而收入的其他决定因素则在整个边界各地平稳而变化。我通过评估中国省边界的体制质量差异的重要性扩展了这一文献。在夜间灯光排放中作为收入的代理,在多个规格中,我没有发现任何证据支持制度主义者对中国省的比较发展。
Robust assessment of the institutionalist account of comparative development is hampered by problems of omitted variable bias and reverse causation, since institutional quality is not randomly assigned with respect to geographic and human capital endowments. A recent series of papers has applied spatial regression discontinuity designs to estimate the impact of institutions on incomes at international borders, drawing inference from the abrupt discontinuity in governance at borders, whereas other determinants of income vary smoothly across borders. I extend this literature by assessing the importance of sub-national variation in institutional quality at provincial borders in China. Employing nighttime lights emissions as a proxy for income, across multiple specifications I find no evidence in favour of an institutionalist account of the comparative development of Chinese provinces.