论文标题
活动识别的加速度计是死端吗?
Are Accelerometers for Activity Recognition a Dead-end?
论文作者
论文摘要
基于加速度计的人类活动识别研究(HAR)是基于加速度计(以及扩展)的研究。该传感器没有为我们提供足够的信息,无法在HAR的核心领域中进步 - 从传感器数据中识别日常活动。尽管在改善功能工程和机器学习模型方面的持续和长期努力,但我们可以可靠地发现的活动仅略有扩展,并且今天仍然存在许多相同的早期模型缺陷。而不是依靠加速数据,我们应该考虑具有更丰富信息的方式 - 逻辑选择是图像。随着图像传感硬件和建模技术的快速进步,我们认为,图像传感器的广泛采用将为许多人类活动开放许多机会,以准确而强大的推论。 在本文中,我们为成像器代替加速度计作为人类活动识别的默认传感器。我们对过去的作品的审查导致了这样的观察,即由于依赖加速度计,HAR的进展停滞不前。我们进一步主张图像对于活动识别的适用性,通过说明其信息丰富和计算机视觉的明显进展。通过可行性分析,我们发现在设备上部署成像仪和CNN不会对现代移动硬件造成重大负担。总体而言,我们的工作强调了需要远离加速度计,并呼吁进一步探索使用成像器进行活动识别。
Accelerometer-based (and by extension other inertial sensors) research for Human Activity Recognition (HAR) is a dead-end. This sensor does not offer enough information for us to progress in the core domain of HAR - to recognize everyday activities from sensor data. Despite continued and prolonged efforts in improving feature engineering and machine learning models, the activities that we can recognize reliably have only expanded slightly and many of the same flaws of early models are still present today. Instead of relying on acceleration data, we should instead consider modalities with much richer information - a logical choice are images. With the rapid advance in image sensing hardware and modelling techniques, we believe that a widespread adoption of image sensors will open many opportunities for accurate and robust inference across a wide spectrum of human activities. In this paper, we make the case for imagers in place of accelerometers as the default sensor for human activity recognition. Our review of past works has led to the observation that progress in HAR had stalled, caused by our reliance on accelerometers. We further argue for the suitability of images for activity recognition by illustrating their richness of information and the marked progress in computer vision. Through a feasibility analysis, we find that deploying imagers and CNNs on device poses no substantial burden on modern mobile hardware. Overall, our work highlights the need to move away from accelerometers and calls for further exploration of using imagers for activity recognition.