论文标题

量化与Wikipedia有关的引用

Quantifying Engagement with Citations on Wikipedia

论文作者

Piccardi, Tiziano, Redi, Miriam, Colavizza, Giovanni, West, Robert

论文摘要

Wikipedia是任何人都可以编辑的免费在线百科全书,是网络上访问量最多的网站之一,也是许多用户的通用信息来源。作为百科全书,维基百科不是原始信息的来源,而是被视为通往次要来源的门户:根据维基百科的指南,必须由可靠的来源来支持事实,以反映出该主题的全部观点。尽管引用是维基百科的核心,但对于用户如何与他们的互动知之甚少。为了缩小这一差距,我们构建了客户端仪器,以登录所有互动,并在一个月内从英语Wikipedia文章中引用参考文献的链接,并首次分析了读者与Wikipedia引用的互动。我们发现,与引文的总体参与度很低:参考点击中约有300页的观看结果(总体上为0.29%;桌面上的0.56%;移动设备为0.13%)。对参考点击相关的因素的匹配的观察性研究表明,在较短页面和质量较低的页面上,点击更频繁地发生,这表明当Wikipedia本身不包含用户所寻求的信息时,更常见地咨询了参考文献。此外,我们观察到,有关生命事件(出生,死亡,婚姻等)的最新内容,开放访问来源和参考特别受欢迎。综上所述,我们的发现为维基百科在可靠性越来越不确定的全球信息经济中的作用更深入地理解开辟了大门,而来源归因越来越重要。

Wikipedia, the free online encyclopedia that anyone can edit, is one of the most visited sites on the Web and a common source of information for many users. As an encyclopedia, Wikipedia is not a source of original information, but was conceived as a gateway to secondary sources: according to Wikipedia's guidelines, facts must be backed up by reliable sources that reflect the full spectrum of views on the topic. Although citations lie at the very heart of Wikipedia, little is known about how users interact with them. To close this gap, we built client-side instrumentation for logging all interactions with links leading from English Wikipedia articles to cited references during one month, and conducted the first analysis of readers' interaction with citations on Wikipedia. We find that overall engagement with citations is low: about one in 300 page views results in a reference click (0.29% overall; 0.56% on desktop; 0.13% on mobile). Matched observational studies of the factors associated with reference clicking reveal that clicks occur more frequently on shorter pages and on pages of lower quality, suggesting that references are consulted more commonly when Wikipedia itself does not contain the information sought by the user. Moreover, we observe that recent content, open access sources and references about life events (births, deaths, marriages, etc) are particularly popular. Taken together, our findings open the door to a deeper understanding of Wikipedia's role in a global information economy where reliability is ever less certain, and source attribution ever more vital.

扫码加入交流群

加入微信交流群

微信交流群二维码

扫码加入学术交流群,获取更多资源