论文标题
前景不合格和费米银河中心过量的点源解释
Foreground Mismodeling and the Point Source Explanation of the Fermi Galactic Center Excess
论文作者
论文摘要
费米大面积的望远镜观察到来自银河系中心的〜gev能量伽马射线过量,这可能是由于近感热的暗物质歼灭而产生的。但是,牢固地确定这种过量的暗物质起源,但是,在建模弥漫性宇宙射线前景以及未解决的天体物理来源(例如毫秒脉冲星)时,挑战是复杂的。非波斯顿模板拟合(NPTF)是一种统计技术,以前用来表明GEV过量的至少一部分可能是由于昏暗点源人群所致。 Leane and Slatyer(2019)最近对这些结果提出了质疑,他们表明,NPTF程序未恢复在真实费米数据顶部注入的合成暗物质an灭信号。在这项工作中,我们对费米数据进行了专门的研究,并明确表明Leane and Slatyer(2019)的主要结果可能是由于他们选择的银河前景发射模型的选择并不能提供足够好的数据描述。我们使用最先进的模型重复NPTF分析,用于以银河系的方式进行弥漫性伽马射线发射,并基于球形谐波边缘化引入新的统计程序,以以数据驱动方式提供对银河系扩散发射的改进描述。通过这些改进,我们发现NPTF的结果继续强烈地赞成这样的解释,即银河中心过剩部分归因于我们探索的分析变化中未解决的天体物理点源。
The Fermi Large Area Telescope has observed an excess of ~GeV energy gamma rays from the center of the Milky Way, which may arise from near-thermal dark matter annihilation. Firmly establishing the dark matter origin for this excess is however complicated by challenges in modeling diffuse cosmic-ray foregrounds as well as unresolved astrophysical sources, such as millisecond pulsars. Non-Poissonian Template Fitting (NPTF) is one statistical technique that has previously been used to show that at least some fraction of the GeV excess is likely due to a population of dim point sources. These results were recently called into question by Leane and Slatyer (2019), who showed that a synthetic dark matter annihilation signal injected on top of the real Fermi data is not recovered by the NPTF procedure. In this work, we perform a dedicated study of the Fermi data and explicitly show that the central result of Leane and Slatyer (2019) is likely driven by the fact that their choice of model for the Galactic foreground emission does not provide a sufficiently good description of the data. We repeat the NPTF analyses using a state-of-the-art model for diffuse gamma-ray emission in the Milky Way and introduce a novel statistical procedure, based on spherical-harmonic marginalization, to provide an improved description of the Galactic diffuse emission in a data-driven fashion. With these improvements, we find that the NPTF results continue to robustly favor the interpretation that the Galactic Center excess is due, in part, to unresolved astrophysical point sources across the analysis variations that we have explored.