论文标题
偶联的黑能和$ H_0 $张力的更新
Update on Coupled Dark Energy and the $H_0$ tension
论文作者
论文摘要
在这项工作中,我们提供了对耦合的暗能量(CDE)宇宙学的最新限制,具有Peebles-Ratra(PR)电位和持续的耦合强度$β$。这种修饰的重力场景引入了暗物质颗粒之间的第五力,这是由扮演暗能量作用的标量场介导的。暗物质颗粒的质量不能保持恒定,而是随时间而变化,随着标量场的函数。 Here we focus on the phenomenological behavior of the model, and assess its ability to describe updated cosmological data sets that include the Planck 2018 cosmic microwave background (CMB) temperature, polarization and lensing, baryon acoustic oscillations, the Pantheon compilation of supernovae of Type Ia, data on $H(z)$ from cosmic chronometers, and redshift-space distortions.我们还研究这是从SH0ES的局部测量$ H_0 $的影响,以及H0licow协作的强范围延迟数据对控制黑暗部门相互作用强度的参数的影响。我们发现一个对应于$β> 0 $的峰,并与潜在参数$α> 0 $,根据数据集组合的不同或多或少明显。我们分别显示了每个数据集的影响,并指出它尤其是CMB镜头,将峰值最多转移到$λ$ CDM的一个数据集。但是,当应用基于完整的贝叶斯证据的模型选择标准时,由于CDE模型中引入的其他参数,在所有情况下仍然首选$λ$ CDM。
In this work we provide updated constraints on coupled dark energy (CDE) cosmology with Peebles-Ratra (PR) potential and constant coupling strength $β$. This modified gravity scenario introduces a fifth force between dark matter particles, mediated by a scalar field that plays the role of dark energy. The mass of the dark matter particles does not remain constant, but changes with time as a function of the scalar field. Here we focus on the phenomenological behavior of the model, and assess its ability to describe updated cosmological data sets that include the Planck 2018 cosmic microwave background (CMB) temperature, polarization and lensing, baryon acoustic oscillations, the Pantheon compilation of supernovae of Type Ia, data on $H(z)$ from cosmic chronometers, and redshift-space distortions. We also study which is the impact of the local measurement of $H_0$ from SH0ES and the strong-lensing time delay data from the H0LICOW collaboration on the parameter that controls the strength of the interaction in the dark sector. We find a peak corresponding to a coupling $β> 0$ and to a potential parameter $α> 0$, more or less evident depending on the data set combination. We show separately the impact of each data set and remark that it is especially CMB lensing the one data set that shifts the peak the most towards $Λ$CDM. When a model selection criterion based on the full Bayesian evidence is applied, however, $Λ$CDM is still preferred in all cases, due to the additional parameters introduced in the CDE model.