论文标题

比较多样性的视听聆听任务中头部安装的显示器和曲面屏幕

Comparison of a Head-Mounted Display and a Curved Screen in a Multi-Talker Audiovisual Listening Task

论文作者

Llorach, Gerard, Hendrikse, Maartje M. E., Grimm, Giso, Hohmann, Volker

论文摘要

简介:虚拟视听技术及其方法尚未建立用于心理声学研究。这项研究检查了不同视听条件对聆听多对话对话时偏好的影响。该研究的目标是在听力研究的背景下探索和评估视听技术。方法:参与者听了四个谈话者之间的视听对话。测试并比较了两个显示:曲面屏幕(CS)和一个头部安装显示(HMD)。使用三个视觉条件(仅听觉,虚拟字符和视频录制),对三组参与者进行了测试:十七个年轻的正常听觉,十个年长的正常听觉和十名年龄较大的听力受损的听众。结果:公开访谈表明,对于较旧的正常听力参与者而言,CS优先于HMD,并且视频录制是首选的视觉状况。年轻和年龄较大的听力受损参与者没有表现出CS和HMD之间的偏好。结论:CSS和视频录制应该是实验室和诊所首选的视听设置,尽管在必要时可以使用HMD和虚拟字符用于听力研究。

Introduction: Virtual audiovisual technology and its methodology has yet to be established for psychoacoustic research. This study examined the effects of different audiovisual conditions on preference when listening to multi-talker conversations. The study's goal is to explore and assess audiovisual technologies in the context of hearing research. Methods: The participants listened to audiovisual conversations between four talkers. Two displays were tested and compared: a curved screen (CS) and a head-mounted display (HMD). Using three visual conditions (audio-only, virtual characters and video recordings), three groups of participants were tested: seventeen young normal-hearing, ten older normal-hearing, and ten older hearing-impaired listeners. Results: Open interviews showed that the CS was preferred over the HMD for older normal-hearing participants and that video recordings were the preferred visual condition. Young and older hearing-impaired participants did not show a preference between the CS and the HMD. Conclusions: CSs and video recordings should be the preferred audiovisual setup of laboratories and clinics, although HMDs and virtual characters can be used for hearing research when necessary and suitable.

扫码加入交流群

加入微信交流群

微信交流群二维码

扫码加入学术交流群,获取更多资源