论文标题
比较多样性的视听聆听任务中头部安装的显示器和曲面屏幕
Comparison of a Head-Mounted Display and a Curved Screen in a Multi-Talker Audiovisual Listening Task
论文作者
论文摘要
简介:虚拟视听技术及其方法尚未建立用于心理声学研究。这项研究检查了不同视听条件对聆听多对话对话时偏好的影响。该研究的目标是在听力研究的背景下探索和评估视听技术。方法:参与者听了四个谈话者之间的视听对话。测试并比较了两个显示:曲面屏幕(CS)和一个头部安装显示(HMD)。使用三个视觉条件(仅听觉,虚拟字符和视频录制),对三组参与者进行了测试:十七个年轻的正常听觉,十个年长的正常听觉和十名年龄较大的听力受损的听众。结果:公开访谈表明,对于较旧的正常听力参与者而言,CS优先于HMD,并且视频录制是首选的视觉状况。年轻和年龄较大的听力受损参与者没有表现出CS和HMD之间的偏好。结论:CSS和视频录制应该是实验室和诊所首选的视听设置,尽管在必要时可以使用HMD和虚拟字符用于听力研究。
Introduction: Virtual audiovisual technology and its methodology has yet to be established for psychoacoustic research. This study examined the effects of different audiovisual conditions on preference when listening to multi-talker conversations. The study's goal is to explore and assess audiovisual technologies in the context of hearing research. Methods: The participants listened to audiovisual conversations between four talkers. Two displays were tested and compared: a curved screen (CS) and a head-mounted display (HMD). Using three visual conditions (audio-only, virtual characters and video recordings), three groups of participants were tested: seventeen young normal-hearing, ten older normal-hearing, and ten older hearing-impaired listeners. Results: Open interviews showed that the CS was preferred over the HMD for older normal-hearing participants and that video recordings were the preferred visual condition. Young and older hearing-impaired participants did not show a preference between the CS and the HMD. Conclusions: CSs and video recordings should be the preferred audiovisual setup of laboratories and clinics, although HMDs and virtual characters can be used for hearing research when necessary and suitable.