论文标题
3D印刷轻型复合泡沫
3D Printed Lightweight Composite Foams
论文作者
论文摘要
本文的目的是通过将空心玻璃微气球(GMB)与高密度聚乙烯(HDPE)混合使用3D打印的轻质复合泡沫。为此,开发了用于打印句法泡沫复合材料的轻质原料。通过在HDPE中使用不同的GMB含量(20、40和60卷%)来制备的混合物用于细丝挤出,随后用于三维印刷(3DP)。研究了混合物的流变特性和熔体流量指数(MFI),以识别合适的打印参数。据观察,存储和损耗模量以及复杂的粘度随着GMB含量的增加而增加,而MFI则减少。此外,HDPE和泡沫丝的热膨胀系数随着GMB含量的增加而降低,从而降低了印刷品中的热应力,从而促进了扭曲的减少。细丝的机械性能是通过将其进行拉伸测试来确定的,而3D印刷样品在拉伸和弯曲测试下进行了测试。与HDPE相比,丝的拉伸模量随着GMB含量的增加(8-47%)而增加,并且表现出可比的细丝强度。与整洁的HDPE相比,3D打印的泡沫显示出更高的特异性拉伸和弯曲模量,使其成为适合体重敏感应用的候选材料。 HDPE具有60%(乘积GMB)的HDPE表现出最高的模量,比印刷HDPE高48.02%。最后,该性质图揭示了针对注射和压缩模压泡沫的更高模量和可比强度。印刷泡沫的模量比模制样品高1.8倍。因此,3D打印的泡沫具有代替通过传统制造过程处理的组件,这些制造过程对几何复杂的设计,交货时间和相关成本有限制。
The goal of this paper is to enable 3D printed lightweight composite foams by blending hollow glass micro balloons (GMB) with high density polyethylene (HDPE). To that end, lightweight feedstock for printing syntactic foam composites is developed. The blend for this is prepared by varying GMB content (20, 40, and 60 volume %) in HDPE for filament extrusion, which is subsequently used for three-dimensional printing (3DP). The rheological properties and the melt flow index (MFI) of blends are investigated for identifying suitable printing parameters. It is observed that the storage and loss modulus, as well as complex viscosity, increases with increasing GMB content, whereas MFI decreases. Further, the coefficient of thermal expansion of HDPE and foam filaments decreases with increasing GMB content, thereby lowering the thermal stresses in prints, which promotes the reduction in warpage. The mechanical properties of filaments are determined by subjecting them to tensile tests, whereas 3D printed samples are tested under tensile and flexure tests. The tensile modulus of the filament increases with increasing GMB content (8-47%) as compared to HDPE and exhibit comparable filament strength. 3D printed foams show higher specific tensile and flexural modulus as compared to neat HDPE, making them suitable candidate materials for weight sensitive applications. HDPE having 60% by volume GMB exhibited the highest modulus and is 48.02% higher than the printed HDPE. Finally, the property map reveals higher modulus and comparable strength against injection and compression molded foams. Printed foam registered 1.8 times higher modulus than molded samples. Hence, 3D printed foams have the potential for replacing components processed through conventional manufacturing processes that have limitations on geometrically complex designs, lead time, and associated costs.