论文标题
使用功能连接组学的神经精神疾病分类 - 神经影像学转移学习挑战中连接的结果
Neuropsychiatric Disease Classification Using Functional Connectomics -- Results of the Connectomics in NeuroImaging Transfer Learning Challenge
论文作者
论文摘要
大型开源联盟数据集刺激了大脑连接学中新的且日益强大的机器学习方法的发展。但是,一个关键的问题仍然是:我们是捕获有关大脑的生物学相关和可推广的信息,还是我们只是对数据过度拟合?为了回答这一点,我们组织了一项科学挑战,即与MICCAI 2019结合进行的神经成像转移学习挑战(CNI-TLC)的连接组学。CNI-TLC包括两个分类任务:(1)诊断注意力缺陷/多动障碍(ADHD)在预生产前队列中; (2)将ADHD模型转移到具有ADHD合并症的自闭症谱系障碍(ASD)患者的相关队列。总共240个静止状态fMRI时间序列根据三个标准拟释期的图谱进行平均,以及临床诊断,用于训练和验证(120个神经型对照和120个ADHD)。我们还提供了年龄,性别,智商和惯用性的人口统计信息。第二组100名受试者(50个神经型对照,25个ADHD和25个具有ADHD合并症的ASD)用于测试。模型以标准化格式作为Docker图像提交,该图像通过Chris(一个开源图像分析平台Chris)提交。利用包容性方法,我们根据16个不同的指标对方法进行了排名。最终排名是在所有措施中使用每个参与者的等级产品计算的。此外,我们评估了每种方法的校准曲线。五名参与者提交了他们的模型进行评估,其中一种表现优于ADHD和ASD分类中的所有其他方法。但是,需要进一步的改进来达到功能连接学的临床翻译。我们将CNI-TLC作为一种公开可用的资源,用于开发和验证连接学领域的新分类方法。
Large, open-source consortium datasets have spurred the development of new and increasingly powerful machine learning approaches in brain connectomics. However, one key question remains: are we capturing biologically relevant and generalizable information about the brain, or are we simply overfitting to the data? To answer this, we organized a scientific challenge, the Connectomics in NeuroImaging Transfer Learning Challenge (CNI-TLC), held in conjunction with MICCAI 2019. CNI-TLC included two classification tasks: (1) diagnosis of Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) within a pre-adolescent cohort; and (2) transference of the ADHD model to a related cohort of Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) patients with an ADHD comorbidity. In total, 240 resting-state fMRI time series averaged according to three standard parcellation atlases, along with clinical diagnosis, were released for training and validation (120 neurotypical controls and 120 ADHD). We also provided demographic information of age, sex, IQ, and handedness. A second set of 100 subjects (50 neurotypical controls, 25 ADHD, and 25 ASD with ADHD comorbidity) was used for testing. Models were submitted in a standardized format as Docker images through ChRIS, an open-source image analysis platform. Utilizing an inclusive approach, we ranked the methods based on 16 different metrics. The final rank was calculated using the rank product for each participant across all measures. Furthermore, we assessed the calibration curves of each method. Five participants submitted their model for evaluation, with one outperforming all other methods in both ADHD and ASD classification. However, further improvements are needed to reach the clinical translation of functional connectomics. We are keeping the CNI-TLC open as a publicly available resource for developing and validating new classification methodologies in the field of connectomics.