论文标题
比较COVID-19大流行与SARS-COV，MERS-COV，埃博拉，Zika，Zika，Avian和Swine流感流行病之间引用趋势的比较
Comparison of Citations Trends between the COVID-19 Pandemic and SARS-CoV, MERS-CoV, Ebola, Zika, Avian and Swine Influenza Epidemics
论文作者
论文摘要
目的：新型的冠状病毒Covid-19爆发迅速发展为大流行。全球研究工作的重点是该主题，并且随着科学期刊出版行业的合作，在爆发爆发后的五个月内，在PubMed中生产了16,000多种相关的文章。本文中，使用SARS-COV，MERS-COV，EBOLA，EBOLA，ZIKA，AVIAN和SWINE流行性流行病进行了对PubMed和Web科学中的Covid-19引文的比较。方法：使用疾病术语和发表限制日期搜索和收集引用。同一时间顺序的PubMed引用和HIV相关论文的总数并行检查。该出版物的期刊类别和国家信息是从Web of Science收集的。对收集的数据进行了统计分析和比较。 Results: Significant correlations were found between COVID-19 and MERS (CC=0.988; p=0.003; q=0.006), Ebola (CC=0.987; p=0.003; q=0.011), and SARS (CC=0.964; p=0.015; q=0.028) epidemics five-month pick of novel citations in PubMed.然而，比其他任何21世纪的主要传染病暴发较早，累积了COVID-19的出版物。结论：COVID-19的加速度和总数代表了医学图书馆历史上前所未有的地标性事件。即时采用快速曲目的同行评审和出版以及《期刊出版商》的开放访问出版物政策是这一书目现象的重要贡献者。
Objective: The novel coronavirus COVID-19 outbreak rapidly evolved into pandemic. Global research efforts focus on this topic and with the collaboration of the scientific journals publication industry produced more than 16,000 related published articles in PubMed within five months from the onset of the outbreak. Herein, a comparison of the COVID-19 citations in PubMed and Web of Science was performed with SARS-CoV, MERS-CoV, Ebola, Zika, avian and swine influenza epidemics. Methods: The citations were searched and collected using the disease terms and the date of publication restriction. The total number of PubMed citations and the HIV associated papers during the same chronological periods were examined in parallel. The journal category and country information of the publications were gathered from Web of Science. The collected data were statistically analyzed and compared. Results: Significant correlations were found between COVID-19 and MERS (CC=0.988; p=0.003; q=0.006), Ebola (CC=0.987; p=0.003; q=0.011), and SARS (CC=0.964; p=0.015; q=0.028) epidemics five-month pick of novel citations in PubMed. However, COVID-19 publications were accumulated earlier and in larger numbers than any other 21st century major communicable disease outbreak. Conclusion: The acceleration and the total number of COVID-19 publications represent an unprecedented landmark event in the medical library history. The immediate adoption of the fast-track peer-reviewing and publishing as well as the open access publication policies by the journal publishers are significant contributors to this bibliographic phenomenon.
