论文标题
在高级Ligo和高级处女座的第三次观察跑的第二部分中搜索光学对应物的含义:从未来的后续观察中学到的经验教训
Implications of the search for optical counterparts during the second part of the Advanced LIGO's and Advanced Virgo's third observing run: lessons learned for future follow-up observations
论文作者
论文摘要
带有重力波和电磁数据的联合多理智观察结果为紧凑物体的天体物理研究提供了新的见解。第三个高级Ligo和高级处女座观察跑步始于2019年4月1日;在观察的11个月中,有14个紧凑型二元系统的候选物,至少有一个成分可能是中子恒星。尽管涉及数十个地面和空间观测站的密集后续活动搜索了同行,但尚未检测到电磁对应物。在对竞选活动的前六个月进行了先前的研究之后,我们在本文的接下来的五个月中介绍了2019年10月至2020年3月的接下来的五个月。我们突出显示了两位中子星 - 黑洞候选人(S191205AH,S200105AE),两位二元中性星候选人,两名二元星星候选人(S191213G和S200213T),以及一位可能的群体和一名可能的星星和一名可能的星星, S200115J。假设引力波候选物是天体物理起源的,并且其位置被光学望远镜覆盖,那么我们根据基于非对应物的未检测,对事件中弹出的物质产生了可能的限制。我们发现,在第三次观测运行的下半部分中的后续观察结果不符合必要的敏感性,以限制潜在的重力波候选者的源特性。因此,我们建议必须使用不同的策略来更好地使用可用的望远镜时间。我们研究了随访调查的不同选择,以优化天空定位覆盖率与\观察深度,以了解对应物检测的可能性。
Joint multi-messenger observations with gravitational waves and electromagnetic data offer new insights into the astrophysical studies of compact objects. The third Advanced LIGO and Advanced Virgo observing run began on April 1, 2019; during the eleven months of observation, there have been 14 compact binary systems candidates for which at least one component is potentially a neutron star. Although intensive follow-up campaigns involving tens of ground and space-based observatories searched for counterparts, no electromagnetic counterpart has been detected. Following on a previous study of the first six months of the campaign, we present in this paper the next five months of the campaign from October 2019 to March 2020. We highlight two neutron star - black hole candidates (S191205ah, S200105ae), two binary neutron star candidates (S191213g and S200213t) and a binary merger with a possible neutron star and a "MassGap" component, S200115j. Assuming that the gravitational-wave candidates are of astrophysical origin and their location was covered by optical telescopes, we derive possible constraints on the matter ejected during the events based on the non-detection of counterparts. We find that the follow-up observations during the second half of the third observing run did not meet the necessary sensitivity to constrain the source properties of the potential gravitational-wave candidate. Consequently, we suggest that different strategies have to be used to allow a better usage of the available telescope time. We examine different choices for follow-up surveys to optimize sky localization coverage vs.\ observational depth to understand the likelihood of counterpart detection.