论文标题
法院记录的在线出版：规避隐私 - 透明度权衡
Online publication of court records: circumventing the privacy-transparency trade-off
论文作者
论文摘要
开放数据运动导致在线法院记录大量发布，提高司法的透明度和可及性，并设计基于可用法律数据财富的法律技术。但是，法律决定的敏感性也引发了重要的隐私问题。当前的实践通过将访问控制与（手动或半手）的文本修订相结合，解决了所得的隐私与透明度权衡。在这项工作中，我们声称当前的做法不足以应付大量访问法律数据（限制性访问控制政策对开放性和公用事业有害，而文本修订无法提供合理的隐私保护），并主张一种可以从隐私保护数据出版领域的最新发展中受益的分类方法。我们对问题和当前方法进行了详尽的分析，并提出了一个稻草人的多模式建筑，为完整的隐私权法律数据出版系统铺平了道路。
The open data movement is leading to the massive publishing of court records online, increasing transparency and accessibility of justice, and to the design of legal technologies building on the wealth of legal data available. However, the sensitive nature of legal decisions also raises important privacy issues. Current practices solve the resulting privacy versus transparency trade-off by combining access control with (manual or semi-manual) text redaction. In this work, we claim that current practices are insufficient for coping with massive access to legal data (restrictive access control policies is detrimental to openness and to utility while text redaction is unable to provide sound privacy protection) and advocate for a in-tegrative approach that could benefit from the latest developments of the privacy-preserving data publishing domain. We present a thorough analysis of the problem and of the current approaches, and propose a straw man multimodal architecture paving the way to a full-fledged privacy-preserving legal data publishing system.
