论文标题
回复“对无确定性的物理学的评论：对古典物理学的替代解释”
Reply to a "Comment on 'Physics without determinism: Alternative interpretations of classical physics' "
论文作者
论文摘要
在此简短说明中，我们回答了Callegaro等人的评论。 [1]（Arxiv：2009.11709）指出了我们在参考文献中提出的不确定物理学模型的一些弱点。 [2]（物理审查A，100（6），P.062107），基于我们称为“有限信息数量”（FIQ）的内容。尽管我们承认他们批评的优点，但我们坚持认为它仅适用于[2]中讨论的具体示例，而FIQ的主要概念仍然有效，适合描述不确定的物理模型。我们暗示了一种更精致的方法来定义FIQ，从直觉学数学中汲取灵感，可以克服[1]中的批评。
In this short note we reply to a comment by Callegaro et al. [1] (arXiv:2009.11709) that points out some weakness of the model of indeterministic physics that we proposed in Ref. [2] (Physical Review A, 100(6), p.062107), based on what we named "finite information quantities" (FIQs). While we acknowledge the merit of their criticism, we maintain that it applies only to a concrete example that we discussed in [2], whereas the main concept of FIQ remains valid and suitable for describing indeterministic physical models. We hint at a more sophisticated way to define FIQs which, taking inspiration from intuitionistic mathematics, would allow to overcome the criticisms in [1].
