论文标题
公众参与的在线平台 - 审议民主还是妄想？
Online platforms of public participation -- a deliberative democracy or a delusion?
论文作者
论文摘要
对民主机构的信任和信心一直处于历史最低水平。同时，城市行政人员和政客所面临的许多复杂问题仍未解决。为了解决这些问题，许多人认为，通过使用数字平台，公民应该更加参与决策过程。本文介绍了两个这样的平台的研究：“决定马德里”和“ Better Reykjavik”。通过使用访谈，问卷调查，人种学观察和平台数据分析，该研究将确定这些平台是否提供了更多的参与或简单地复制许多其他数字工具已经提供的内容。迄今为止的发现表明，要成功的平台必须采取一种审议民主的形式，允许知识共同生产和集体智慧的出现。基于此，我们旨在确定可持续参与的可持续模型的关键特征。
Trust and confidence in democratic institutions is at an all-time low. At the same time, many of the complex issues faced by city administrators and politicians remain unresolved. To tackle these concerns, many argue that citizens should, through the use of digital platforms, have greater involvement in decision-making processes. This paper describes research into two such platforms, 'Decide Madrid' and 'Better Reykjavik'. Through the use of interviews, questionnaires, ethnographic observation, and analysis of platform data, the study will determine if these platforms provide greater participation or simply replicate what is already offered by numerous other digital tools. The findings so far suggest that to be successful platforms must take on a form of deliberative democracy, allowing for knowledge co-production and the emergence of collective intelligence. Based on this, we aim to identify key features of sustainable models of online participation.
