论文标题
改善与标准化网络安全术语的跨学科沟通：文献综述
Improving Interdisciplinary Communication With Standardized Cyber Security Terminology: A Literature Review
论文作者
论文摘要
对计算机安全和网络化趋势的需求不断增长，是21世纪的标志。通过相应的新技术投资跃升，用于确保全球计算机的新技术投资的相应增长，网络犯罪，数字货币，电子政务等等的上升得到了很好的满足。最近，商业和政府部门开始将精力集中在全面的网络安全解决方案上。随着这种增长，已经出现了更大的协作方法和安全性测量方法。尽管做了所有这些努力，但尚未满足这一需求，并且在计算机安全领域中仍然很少。本文回顾了网络安全研究的新趋势，其贡献和一些可识别的局限性。我们认为，这些局限性在很大程度上是由于解决了明显多方面的问题所需的合作。然后，我们确定需要在计算机安全中进一步标准化术语的需求，并为全球互联网多利益相关者社区提供指南，以在制定此类标准时考虑。我们还评估了某些特定术语的生存能力，包括当网络是描述符时是否应用作单独的单词（例如网络安全性或网络安全性），并以对网络安全的编写未来论文的建议，或者与网络空间有关的所有事物的更广泛的新领域的建议，最近与型网络学家有关，我们还与cybermatics进行了调查或cy cyers cysers and Cysers cysers and Cysers and consose and consers and Cysers and Cysers。通过促进标准化网络安全术语的努力，本文为跨学科合作，技术和非技术利益相关者之间的一致性以及起草通用互联网治理法的起草奠定了基础。
The growing demand for computer security and the cyberization trend are hallmarks of the 21st century. The rise in cyber-crime, digital currency, e-governance, and more, is well met by a corresponding recent jump in investment in new technology for securing computers around the globe. Recently, business and government sectors have begun to focus efforts on comprehensive cyber security solutions. With this growth has emerged the need for greater methods of collabo-ration and measurement of security. Despite all these efforts, this need has not been met, and there is still too little cross-disciplinary collaboration in the realm of computer security. This paper reviews the new trends in cyber security research, their contributions, and some identifiable limitations. We argue that these limitations are due largely to the absence of co-operation required to address a problem that is clearly multifaceted. We then identify a need for further standardization of terminology in computer security and propose guidelines for the global Internet multistakeholder community to consider when crafting such standards. We also assess the viability of some specific terms, including whether cyber should be used as a separate word when it is a descriptor (e.g. cyber security or cybersecurity), and conclude with recommendations for writing future papers on cyber security or the broader new field of all things relating to cyberspace, which has recently been dubbed Cybermatics, a term we also examine and propose alternatives to, like Cyber or Cybernomics. By furthering the effort of standardizing cyber security terminology, this paper lays groundwork for cross-disciplinary collaboration, agreement between technical and nontechnical stakeholders, and the drafting of universal Internet governance laws.
