论文标题
子场的声望和计算中的性别不平等
Subfield prestige and gender inequality in computing
论文作者
论文摘要
在计算机教师中,有色人种和有色人种的人口多样性的改善缓慢而不平衡。有效的多元化策略取决于量化该领域多样性的相关性,原因和趋势。但是,由于教师搜索通常在子场级别,因此人口统计学变化是由子场招聘动态驱动的。在这里,我们使用与美国269个博士学位授予计算部门的6882个终身制学院的培训和就业记录的综合数据库量化计算子场的人口统计学差异和预测变化,并与327,969个出版物相关。我们发现,子领先的声望与性别不平等相关,因此,从事更多女性的计算子领域的教师倾向于在较不享有声望的机构中担任职位。相比之下,我们没有发现子领域的种族或社会经济差异的重要证据。随着时间的流逝,我们发现在所有子领域的性别平等方面都稳步进步,但是更享有声望的子领域往往落后于性别代表的享有盛名的子领域的25年。这些结果说明了教师搜索中的子领域的选择如何塑造部门的性别多样性。
Women and people of color remain dramatically underrepresented among computing faculty, and improvements in demographic diversity are slow and uneven. Effective diversification strategies depend on quantifying the correlates, causes, and trends of diversity in the field. But field-level demographic changes are driven by subfield hiring dynamics because faculty searches are typically at the subfield level. Here, we quantify and forecast variations in the demographic composition of the subfields of computing using a comprehensive database of training and employment records for 6882 tenure-track faculty from 269 PhD-granting computing departments in the United States, linked with 327,969 publications. We find that subfield prestige correlates with gender inequality, such that faculty working in computing subfields with more women tend to hold positions at less prestigious institutions. In contrast, we find no significant evidence of racial or socioeconomic differences by subfield. Tracking representation over time, we find steady progress toward gender equality in all subfields, but more prestigious subfields tend to be roughly 25 years behind the less prestigious subfields in gender representation. These results illustrate how the choice of subfield in a faculty search can shape a department's gender diversity.