论文标题

社会人口统计学模式如何定义数字隐私鸿沟?

How Do Socio-Demographic Patterns Define Digital Privacy Divide?

论文作者

Alhazmi, Hamoud, Imran, Ahmed, Alsheikh, Mohammad Abu

论文摘要

数字隐私已成为信息和通信技术(ICT)系统的重要组成部分。有许多用于数字隐私保护的现有方法,包括网络安全,加密和访问控制。但是,用户可用的数字隐私保护级别仍然存在差距。本文研究了ICT系统中的数字隐私鸿沟(DPD)问题。首先,我们通过使用众包任务分配收集776位ICT用户的响应来介绍在线DPD研究,以理解DPD问题。其次,我们提出了一种基于因子分析的统计方法,用于从一组可观察到的DPD问题变量中生成DPD指数。特别是,DPD索引通过探索DPD调查中八个问题的维度来为DPD差距提供一个缩放量度。第三,我们引入了DPD比例赔率模型,以分析用户的DPD状态与社会人口统计学模式之间的关系。我们的结果表明,DPD调查通过严格的统计措施(例如Cronbach的$α= 0.92 $)符合内部一致性可靠性。此外,DPD索引被证明可捕获所有DPD变量的基本共同点。最后,DPD比例赔率模型表明DPD状态与ICT使用者的年龄组之间存在很强的统计相关性。例如,我们发现年轻用户(15 - 32年)通常比高级人士(33岁及以上)更关心其数字隐私。

Digital privacy has become an essential component of information and communications technology (ICT) systems. There are many existing methods for digital privacy protection, including network security, cryptography, and access control. However, there is still a gap in the digital privacy protection levels available for users. This paper studies the digital privacy divide (DPD) problem in ICT systems. First, we introduce an online DPD study for understanding the DPD problem by collecting responses from 776 ICT users using crowdsourcing task assignments. Second, we propose a factor analysis-based statistical method for generating the DPD index from a set of observable DPD question variables. In particular, the DPD index provides one scaled measure for the DPD gap by exploring the dimensionality of the eight questions in the DPD survey. Third, we introduce a DPD proportional odds model for analyzing the relationship between the DPD status and the socio-demographic patterns of the users. Our results show that the DPD survey meets the internal consistency reliability with rigorous statistical measures, e.g., Cronbach's $α=0.92$. Furthermore, the DPD index is shown to capture the underlying communality of all DPD variables. Finally, the DPD proportional odds model indicates a strong statistical correlation between the DPD status and the age groups of the ICT users. For example, we find that young users (15-32 years) are generally more concerned about their digital privacy than senior ones (33 years and over).

扫码加入交流群

加入微信交流群

微信交流群二维码

扫码加入学术交流群,获取更多资源