学术文献库

FPGA-based accelerators are becoming more popular for deep neural network due to the ability to scale performance with increasing degree of specialization with dataflow architectures or custom data types. To reduce the barrier for software engineers and data scientists to adopt FPGAs, C++- and OpenCL-based design entries with high-level synthesis (HLS) have been introduced. They provide higher abstraction compared to register-transfer level (RTL)-based design. HLS offers faster development time, better maintainability and more flexibility in code exploration, when evaluating options for multi-dimension tensors, convolutional layers or parallelism. Thus, HLS has been adopted by DNN accelerator generation frameworks such as FINN and hls4ml. In this paper, we present an alternative backend RTL library for FINN. We investigate and evaluate, across a spectrum of design dimensions, an RTL-based implementation versus the original HLS variant. We show that for smaller design parameters, RTL produces significantly smaller circuits. For larger circuits, however, the look-up table (LUT) count of RTL-based design is slightly higher, up to around $15\%$. On the other hand, HLS consistently requires more flip-flops (FFs) (orders-of-magnitude increase) and block RAMs (BRAMs) ($2\times$ more). This also impacts the critical path delay, with RTL producing significantly faster circuits, up to $80\%$. Furthermore, RTL also benefits from at-least a $10\times$ reduction in synthesis time. Finally the results were practically validated using a real-world use case of a multi-layer perceptron (MLP) network used in network intrusion detection. Overall, since HLS frameworks code-generate the hardware design, the benefits of the ease in the design entry is less important as compared to synthesis time reduction togther with resource benefits, this might make the RTL abstraction an attractive alternative.