学术文献库

Demand response involves system operators using incentives to modulate electricity consumption during peak hours or when faced with an incidental supply shortage. However, system operators typically have imperfect information about their customers' baselines, that is, their consumption had the incentive been absent. The standard approach to estimate the reduction in a customer's electricity consumption then is to estimate their counterfactual baseline. However, this approach is not robust to estimation errors or strategic exploitation by the customers and can potentially lead to overpayments to customers who do not reduce their consumption and underpayments to those who do. Moreover, optimal power consumption reductions of the customers depend on the costs that they incur for curtailing consumption, which in general are private knowledge of the customers, and which they could strategically misreport in an effort to improve their own utilities even if it deteriorates the overall system cost. The two-stage mechanism proposed in this paper circumvents the aforementioned issues. In the day-ahead market, the participating loads are required to submit only a probabilistic description of their next-day consumption and costs to the system operator for day-ahead planning. It is only in real-time, if and when called upon for demand response, that the loads are required to report their baselines and costs. They receive credits for reductions below their reported baselines. The mechanism for calculating the credits guarantees incentive compatibility of truthful reporting of the probability distribution in the day-ahead market and truthful reporting of the baseline and cost in real-time. The mechanism can be viewed as an extension of the celebrated Vickrey-Clarke-Groves mechanism augmented with a carefully crafted second-stage penalty for deviations from the day-ahead bids.