论文标题

调查向后策略学习在逻辑导师中的影响:协助子目标对改善问题解决的影响

Investigating the Impact of Backward Strategy Learning in a Logic Tutor: Aiding Subgoal Learning towards Improved Problem Solving

论文作者

Shabrina, Preya, Mostafavi, Behrooz, Abdelshiheed, Mark, Chi, Min, Barnes, Tiffany

论文摘要

学习得出子目标可以减少专家与学生之间的差距,并使学生为将来的问题做好准备。研究人员探索了在传统问题解决和辅导系统中的解释,以帮助新手学习亚基群。但是,对于与亚目标学习关系的解决问题策略只有一些研究。此外,这些策略在基于计算机的老师和学习环境中的探索还不足。向后解决问题的策略与子目标的过程密切相关,在该过程中,解决问题将目标切入了一个新的子目标,以减少难度。在本文中,我们探讨了在教授逻辑证明结构的智能逻辑导师中为向后策略学习的培训策略。培训课程涉及向后工作的例子(BWE)和解决问题(BP),以帮助学生学习向后的策略,以提高他们的子目标和解决问题的能力。为了评估培训策略,我们分析了学生的1)经验和学习后退策略的经验,2)绩效; 3)在每个培训和测试后的培训后​​,他们在没有导师的情况下独立解决的新问题的证明施工方法。我们的结果表明,当在没有任何导师帮助的情况下解决新问题以解决新问题时,接受过BWE和BPS培训的学生优于在培训期间没有接受过治疗或仅接受BWE的学生。此外,在证明结构期间接受了BWE和BPS培训的学生,其效率明显高于其他两组。

Learning to derive subgoals reduces the gap between experts and students and makes students prepared for future problem solving. Researchers have explored subgoal labeled instructional materials with explanations in traditional problem solving and within tutoring systems to help novices learn to subgoal. However, only a little research is found on problem-solving strategies in relationship with subgoal learning. Also, these strategies are under-explored within computer-based tutors and learning environments. Backward problem-solving strategy is closely related to the process of subgoaling, where problem solving iteratively refines the goal into a new subgoal to reduce difficulty. In this paper, we explore a training strategy for backward strategy learning within an intelligent logic tutor that teaches logic proof construction. The training session involved backward worked examples (BWE) and problem-solving (BPS) to help students learn backward strategy towards improving their subgoaling and problem-solving skills. To evaluate the training strategy, we analyzed students' 1) experience with and engagement in learning backward strategy, 2) performance, and 3) proof construction approaches in new problems that they solved independently without tutor help after each level of training and in post-test. Our results showed that, when new problems were given to solve without any tutor help, students who were trained with both BWE and BPS outperformed students who received none of the treatment or only BWE during training. Additionally, students trained with both BWE and BPS derived subgoals during proof construction with significantly higher efficiency than the other two groups.

扫码加入交流群

加入微信交流群

微信交流群二维码

扫码加入学术交流群,获取更多资源