论文标题
古典人与凯恩斯主义者：两种主要经济思想流派之间的五十个区别
Classicals versus Keynesians: Fifty Distinctions between Two Major Schools of Economic Thought
论文作者
论文摘要
宏观经济学本质上从各种经济思想流派的角度讨论了宏观经济现象，每种经济学对宏观经济代理如何做出决策以及相应市场的运作方式都有不同的看法。因此，对这些经济思想流派不同是如何以及以什么方式发展的清晰，全面的理解是经济学学生在学科上在学术和专业上繁荣发展的关键和先决条件。随着经济学学生在更高水平的教育和研究生院进行研究，这变得更加重要，在此期间，预计学生将获得更高水平的Bloom分类法，包括分析，综合，评估和创造。教授两种主要经济思想流派的区别和相似性从来都不是在课堂上承担的简单任务。尽管造成这种艰辛的原因可能是多重的，但毫无疑问，学生对两个主流经济学的思维方式如何有所不同。有强有力的证据表明，学生在建立这种基础工作后会更加顺畅地过渡到更高水平的教育，他们可以在以后进一步建立（例如Didia和Hasnat，1998; Marcal and Roberts，2001; Islam等，2008; Green等，2009; White; White，2016年）。本文以各种经济思想流派的视觉范围开始，然后将范围缩小到古典和凯恩斯主义的学校，即现代宏观经济学的骨干。之后，一张整体桌子以50个方面的形式将两所学校对比。这张桌子不仅可以帮助经济学学生增强他们的理解，保留率和思想的关键能力，而且还使宏观经济教师有益于...
Macroeconomics essentially discusses macroeconomic phenomena from the perspectives of various schools of economic thought, each of which takes different views on how macroeconomic agents make decisions and how the corresponding markets operate. Therefore, developing a clear, comprehensive understanding of how and in what ways these schools of economic thought differ is a key and a prerequisite for economics students to prosper academically and professionally in the discipline. This becomes even more crucial as economics students pursue their studies toward higher levels of education and graduate school, during which students are expected to attain higher levels of Bloom's taxonomy, including analysis, synthesis, evaluation, and creation. Teaching the distinctions and similarities of the two major schools of economic thought has never been an easy task to undertake in the classroom. Although the reason for such a hardship can be multi-fold, one reason has undoubtedly been students' lack of a holistic view on how the two mainstream economic schools of thought differ. There is strong evidence that students make smoother transition to higher levels of education after building up such groundwork, on which they can build further later on (e.g. Didia and Hasnat, 1998; Marcal and Roberts, 2001; Islam, et al., 2008; Green, et al., 2009; White, 2016). The paper starts with a visual spectrum of various schools of economic thought, and then narrows down the scope to the classical and Keynesian schools, i.e. the backbone of modern macroeconomics. Afterwards, a holistic table contrasts the two schools in terms of 50 aspects. Not only does this table help economics students enhance their comprehension, retention, and critical-thinking capability, it also benefits macroeconomic instructors to ...
