论文标题
解决问题,收获益处 - 对围绕AI的监管辩论的系统审查
Tackling problems, harvesting benefits -- A systematic review of the regulatory debate around AI
论文作者
论文摘要
如何将AI等新兴和全面的技术融入我们社会的结构和运营中是当代政治,科学和公众辩论的问题。它从不同学科中产生了大量的国际学术文献。本文分析了有关人工智能调节(AI)的学术辩论。该系统审查包括2016年1月1日至2020年12月31日发表的73个同行评审期刊文章样本。分析集中在社会风险和危害,监管责任问题以及可能的充分政策框架上,包括基于风险和原则的方法。主要利益是拟议的监管方法和工具。提出了各种形式的干预措施,例如禁令,批准,标准设定和披露。对所包含论文的评估表明该领域的复杂性,这表明其早产性和剩余的缺乏清晰度。通过对学术辩论进行结构性分析,我们在经验和概念上都对对AI和监管的联系以及基本规范决策的联系有了更好的理解。科学建议与拟议的欧洲AI调节的比较说明了调节的特定方法,其优势和劣势。
How to integrate an emerging and all-pervasive technology such as AI into the structures and operations of our society is a question of contemporary politics, science and public debate. It has produced a considerable amount of international academic literature from different disciplines. This article analyzes the academic debate around the regulation of artificial intelligence (AI). The systematic review comprises a sample of 73 peer-reviewed journal articles published between January 1st, 2016, and December 31st, 2020. The analysis concentrates on societal risks and harms, questions of regulatory responsibility, and possible adequate policy frameworks, including risk-based and principle-based approaches. The main interests are proposed regulatory approaches and instruments. Various forms of interventions such as bans, approvals, standard-setting, and disclosure are presented. The assessments of the included papers indicate the complexity of the field, which shows its prematurity and the remaining lack of clarity. By presenting a structured analysis of the academic debate, we contribute both empirically and conceptually to a better understanding of the nexus of AI and regulation and the underlying normative decisions. A comparison of the scientific proposals with the proposed European AI regulation illustrates the specific approach of the regulation, its strengths and weaknesses.