论文标题

不和谐问题:新闻报道中多样性分析的计算方法

Discord Questions: A Computational Approach To Diversity Analysis in News Coverage

论文作者

Laban, Philippe, Wu, Chien-Sheng, Murakhovs'ka, Lidiya, Chen, Xiang 'Anthony', Xiong, Caiming

论文摘要

新闻读者可以访问各种来源,这有许多潜在的好处。现代新闻集合商在组织新闻方面做了一项艰苦的工作,为读者提供了众多的来源选择,但是选择阅读的来源仍然具有挑战性。我们提出了一个新的框架,以帮助读者识别来源差异并了解新闻报道多样性。该框架基于一系列不和谐问题:具有多样化答案池的问题,明确说明了来源差异。 To assemble a prototype of the framework, we focus on two components: (1) discord question generation, the task of generating questions answered differently by sources, for which we propose an automatic scoring method, and create a model that improves performance from current question generation (QG) methods by 5%, (2) answer consolidation, the task of grouping answers to a question that are semantically similar, for which we collect data and repurpose a method that achieves在我们现实的测试集上,81%的平衡精度。我们通过原型接口说明了框架的可行性。尽管Discord QG的模型性能仍然落后于人类绩效超过15%,但判断出的问题比Factoid问题更有趣,并且可以揭示新闻报道中的细节,情感和来源推理的差异。

There are many potential benefits to news readers accessing diverse sources. Modern news aggregators do the hard work of organizing the news, offering readers a plethora of source options, but choosing which source to read remains challenging. We propose a new framework to assist readers in identifying source differences and gaining an understanding of news coverage diversity. The framework is based on the generation of Discord Questions: questions with a diverse answer pool, explicitly illustrating source differences. To assemble a prototype of the framework, we focus on two components: (1) discord question generation, the task of generating questions answered differently by sources, for which we propose an automatic scoring method, and create a model that improves performance from current question generation (QG) methods by 5%, (2) answer consolidation, the task of grouping answers to a question that are semantically similar, for which we collect data and repurpose a method that achieves 81% balanced accuracy on our realistic test set. We illustrate the framework's feasibility through a prototype interface. Even though model performance at discord QG still lags human performance by more than 15%, generated questions are judged to be more interesting than factoid questions and can reveal differences in the level of detail, sentiment, and reasoning of sources in news coverage.

扫码加入交流群

加入微信交流群

微信交流群二维码

扫码加入学术交流群,获取更多资源