论文标题
来自无监督的多途径测量值的TRGB(CAT)的比较分析:对比是关键
Comparative Analysis of TRGBs (CATs) from Unsupervised, Multi-Halo-Field Measurements: Contrast is Key
论文作者
论文摘要
由于红色巨型进化阶段的末端,红色巨型分支(TRGB)的尖端是沿巨型分支的颜色标记图(CMD)的明显不连续性,用于测量本地宇宙中的距离。在实践中,尖端通常是模糊的,并且通过边缘检测响应(EDR)定位依赖于逐案使用的几种方法。很难评估单个选择仅使用单个宿主字段影响距离估计的,同时也避免了确认偏差。为了设计一种标准化方法,我们比较了每个星系中多个光晕场中TRGB的无监督,算法分析,使用Hubble Space Telescope获得的鬼魂调查获得的鬼魂调查获得的高信号到10个星系中的单个宿主和50个领域,并在10个星系中进行了50个字段。我们首先优化了最低场到场分散体的方法,包括空间滤波,以删除恒星形成区域,亮度功能的平滑和加权,根据颜色选择RGB以及根据可能的RGB恒星的数量以及在上方的恒星的数量以及在尖端下方的恒星比($ r $)的选择。我们发现$ r $,称为“对比”,是EDR测量质量的最重要指标;我们发现,野外EDR的可重复性从0.3 mag到$ \ leq $ 0.05 mag,分别为$ r = 4 $至7,尽管范围不到一半的田地达到了较高的质量。 Further, we find that $R$, which varies with the age/metallicity of the stellar population based on models, correlates with the magnitude of the tip (and after accounting for low internal extinction), i.e., a tip-contrast relation with slope of $-0.023\pm0.0046$ mag/ratio, a $\sim 5σ$ result that improves standardization of the TRGB.我们讨论了跨梯级一致的TRGB标准化的价值,以实现可靠的距离梯子测量。
The Tip of the Red Giant Branch (TRGB) is an apparent discontinuity in the color-magnitude diagram (CMD) along the giant branch due to the end of the red giant evolutionary phase and is used to measure distances in the local universe. In practice, the tip is often fuzzy and its localization via edge detection response (EDR) relies on several methods applied on a case-by-case basis. It is hard to evaluate how individual choices affect a distance estimation using only a single host field while also avoiding confirmation bias. To devise a standardized approach, we compare unsupervised, algorithmic analyses of the TRGB in multiple halo fields per galaxy, up to 11 fields for a single host and 50 fields across 10 galaxies, using high signal-to-noise stellar photometry obtained by the GHOSTS survey with the Hubble Space Telescope. We first optimize methods for the lowest field-to-field dispersion including spatial filtering to remove star forming regions, smoothing and weighting of the luminosity function, selection of the RGB by color, and tip selection based on the number of likely RGB stars and the ratio of stars above versus below the tip ($R$). We find $R$, which we call the tip `contrast', to be the most important indicator of the quality of EDR measurements; we find that field-to-field EDR repeatability varies from 0.3 mag to $\leq$ 0.05 mag for $R=4$ to 7, respectively, though less than half the fields reach the higher quality. Further, we find that $R$, which varies with the age/metallicity of the stellar population based on models, correlates with the magnitude of the tip (and after accounting for low internal extinction), i.e., a tip-contrast relation with slope of $-0.023\pm0.0046$ mag/ratio, a $\sim 5σ$ result that improves standardization of the TRGB. We discuss the value of consistent TRGB standardization across rungs for robust distance ladder measurements.