论文标题
软件工程研究的心理测量工具:五十年后现状
Psychometric Instruments in Software Engineering Research on Personality: Status Quo After Fifty Years
论文作者
论文摘要
背景:尽管软件开发是一项人工活动,但软件工程(SE)研究主要集中在过程和工具上,使人为因素的代表性不足。使用以人为中心的学科的知识可以改善这种研究。错过机会的一个例子是SE如何使用心理测量器。目的:在SE研究中提供有关个性的心理测量工具的概述,并提供采用这些仪器的建议。方法:我们进行了系统的映射,以概述SE中用于评估个性的工具的概述,并从SE和社会科学的多学科角度审查了它们的使用。结果:我们进行了一项涉及五十年研究(1970年至2020年)的二级研究。最被采用的工具之一(MBTI)在社会科学中面临批评,我们确定了其应用和现有建议之间的差异。我们强调,有几种工具是指五因素模型,尽管它与社会科学相关,但对其在SE中的应用没有具体建议。我们讨论有关其适当应用的一般建议。结论:调查结果表明,在社会科学研究人员的支持下,需要改善有关SE中人格的心理测量工具的采用。我们认为,这项研究中提出的审查可以帮助理解局限性并朝这个方向发展。
Context: Although software development is a human activity, Software Engineering (SE) research has focused mostly on processes and tools, making human factors underrepresented. This kind of research may be improved using knowledge from human-focused disciplines. An example of missed opportunities is how SE employs psychometric instruments. Objective: Provide an overview of psychometric instruments in SE research regarding personality and provide recommendations for adopting them. Method: We conducted a systematic mapping to build an overview of instruments used within SE for assessing personality and reviewed their use from a multidisciplinary perspective of SE and social science. Results: We contribute with a secondary study covering fifty years of research (1970 to 2020). One of the most adopted instruments (MBTI) faces criticism within social sciences, and we identified discrepancies between its application and existing recommendations. We emphasize that several instruments refer to the Five-Factor Model, which despite its relevance in social sciences, has no specific advice for its application within SE. We discuss general advice for its proper application. Conclusion: The findings show that the adoption of psychometric instruments regarding personality in SE needs to be improved, ideally with the support of social science researchers. We believe that the review presented in this study can help to understand limitations and to evolve in this direction.