论文标题
性别歧义的特殊性和非英语作者姓名以外的经济论文的命名
Peculiarities of gender disambiguation and ordering of non-English authors' names for Economic papers beyond core databases
论文作者
论文摘要
本文介绍了与乌克兰经济学研究相关的CrossRef数据进一步探索的结果（第一部分可以在[Mryglod，O.，Nazarovets，S。＆Kozmenko，S。（2021）ScientMetrics，126，8187]）。我们的目的是补充乌克兰经济学纪律的定量肖像，并在个人作者层面上进行性别和作者订购分析的结果，使用参考书目数据的特殊方法，并使用了主要的非英语作者份额。性别混合的特性，男性和女性作者在作者身份清单中占据了第一名的可能性以及名称的安排。使用CrossRef Metadata构建了包含与乌克兰期刊出版物有关的书目记录的数据集。使用此类特定数据的所述阶段有助于在作者的水平上工作，并尤其是性别问题。尽管女性作家数量越来越多，但性别平等更有可能在乌克兰经济学学科的个人层面上报告。发现对协作或独奏的倾向以及性别混合模式的趋势取决于期刊：在Scopus和/或科学数据库中索引的出版物的差异。还发现乌克兰经济学研究的特征是作者的非按字母顺序。据我们所知，这是乌克兰经济纪律的首次大规模定量研究。所获得的结果不仅在国家一级都很有价值，而且还有助于有关经济研究，性别问题和作者姓名顺序的一般知识。在这里，首次将注意力引起了斯拉夫作者名称的特征的明确使用。
This paper presents the results of further exploration of Crossref data related to Ukrainian Economics research (the first part can be found in [Mryglod, O., Nazarovets, S. & Kozmenko, S. (2021) Scientometrics, 126, 8187]). Our purpose is to supplement the quantitative portrait of Ukrainian Economics discipline with the results of gender and author ordering analysis at the level of individual authors, special methods of working with bibliographic data with a predominant share of non-English authors are used. The properties of gender mixing, the likelihood of male and female authors occupying the first position in the authorship list, as well as the arrangements of names are studied. A data set containing bibliographic records related to Ukrainian journal publications in the field of Economics is constructed using Crossref metadata. The described stages for working with such specific data help to work at the level of authors and analyse, in particular, gender issues. Despite the larger number of female authors, gender equality is more likely to be reported at the individual level for the discipline of Ukrainian Economics. The tendencies towards collaborative or solo-publications and gender mixing patterns are found to be dependent on the journal: the differences for publications indexed in Scopus and/or Web of Science databases are found. It has also been found that Ukrainian Economics research is characterized by rather a non-alphabetical order of authors. To our knowledge, this is the first large-scale quantitative study of Ukrainian Economic discipline. The results obtained are valuable not only at the national level, but also contribute to general knowledge about Economic research, gender issues and authors' names ordering. Here, for the first time, attention is drawn to the explicit use of the features of the Slavic authors' names.
